I will
scatter them, and then I will gather them: Deuteronomy 4:27; 28:64; 32:26;
Isaiah 11:12;
Jeremiah 23:8 / Read about the African Slave Trade in Deuteronomy 28th Chapter.
REPARATIONS
NOW IN OUR LIFETIME
N E W S L E T T
E R!
>>>>> #26 <<<<<
MAY 2002
*********
WE ARE HUMAN BEINGS, AND WE
OWE IT TO OUR CHILDREN TO ESTABLISH AND DEMAND BETTER LIVES FOR THEM AND FOR
OURSELVES!
*********
GIVE POWER AND MEANING TO
THE REPARATIONS MASS
MOVEMENT - GIVE OF YOURSELF!
*********
“Take
direct action against the U.S. government!” Dr. Robert Brock
*********
Note
from the REPNOW Newsletter Editor:
THIRD WORLD CITATION
May
2002
”Third
World” is a
description that’s been around for a very long time. As to how long, I’m really not
sure. But given the definition of
this term and what it entails, it’s time for its demise.
The New Merriam – Webster Dictionary defines “Third World” as being:
The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia, Third Edition defines “Third World as being:
- name applied to the technologically less-advanced, or developing, nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America. The term was originally used to distinguish these countries from the western nations and those that formed the Eastern bloc and usually excludes China.
Did you ever wonder why the term “Third World” still exists?
This term is the other
side of the tracks, the way the other half lives, the have nots, the
underprivileged, the undeveloped, the impoverished, the substandard, the
so-called inferior, the people of color!
For those of us who are aware of the disparities and the unequal distribution of wealth, know all too well exactly why there is a term called “Third World.” And if it were left up to the so-called “predominant culture” this term would be with us forever and with the objective of enabling the rulers of this world to perpetuate White Supremacy on this planet.
Without giving this allusion much thought, we just accept this term, “Third World,” as being a matter of fact. Well, don’t look now, but “WE” – Black Peoples - assist the powers-that-be in their efforts to sustain Blacks and other people of color of “Third World” significance or rather insignificance. Then again, maybe we should “look now” and plan to do something about it.
Whites hire Blacks for all manner of positions, and some of these jobs come with darn good salaries, too. And if minorities want to stay employed, they do as they are told no matter the consequencesand no matter who gets hurt in the process - unfortunately, in most cases, Black Folks.
We have some Black School Chancellors and some heads of Education Departments, yet Blacks have the worse systems of education in our communities. There are even many Black mayors throughout the US, but their cities cannot compare to those in which White Folks live. Privileged Whites are not graced with the worst ghettoes known to man. And it would appear that Supreme Justice Clarence Thomas, Secretary of State Colin Powell, and National Security Adviser Condalezza Rice are all oblivious to being Black and that they are a part of the makeup of the Third World Citation. Otherwise, they would be on this Reparations bandwagon. Then there is the Black African from Ghana, the Secretary General of the United Nations Kofi Annan, serving a second term, nonetheless. For what? Not for Blacks and not even for his Ghanaians or other Africans. And let’s not forget our Black Representatives in Congress. It seems they are too busy tending to the needs of White Folks and Israelis and other foreign countries to be concerned with Blacks in their very own land of “Liberty, Justice, and Freedom.” And as a matter of fact, in view of the US walk out of the World Conference Against Racism (WCAR), it seems that our Black Representatives, including the Black Caucus (excluding Rep. Cynthia McKinney), are of no real value to those they are supposed to represent. Where is their voice in Congress to back the present thrust for Reparations? Where is the same exhibition for this cause that they displayed for former President Clinton and his cause, which has done absolutely nothing for the Black Plight – NOTHING! Wouldn’t their assistance cause or rather facilitate a more rapid advancement towards progress and fulfillment of Reparations if they would only be more tenacious and assertive in their offices? And can’t our Representatives get on the case to address and rid this country of the racism and deprivation that exists? APPARENTLY NOT! If the White Jews in the United States can scheme and connive to get the Congress and the Senate to spend our tax dollars on people who aren’t even “Jews” but Converted Europeans, albeit IN ANOTHER COUNTRY, why can’t we get this US government to do same for the Black communities in the so-called Good Ol’ US of A? If this is an impossible task, then it’s time for Black Folks to wake up and seek alternatives that will work in our favor for our prosperity and SELF DETERMINATION. If we don’t, then prepare to endure continued injustice, suppression, degradation, exclusion, and, yes, of course, Third World Citation.
I know, you know, and they know that Descendants of Slaves are but pawns up against a corrupt government since its inception. The Judicial System is made up of laws, lawyers, and judges that are programmed to work against Blacks and our prosperity. Racial profiling, police brutality, lynchings, deceptive penal system, and institutional racism are all systems in place to sustain our decline and demise. If our Black Youth are not in jail, on drugs, or dead, they soon will be unless we take charge of our Peoples and make a serious transition regarding our status in the United States and in this world.
Since the Sixties, Black Folks have regressed, and although we are not back to square one, we most certainly are not members of a just and equitable society. And since we are not and since it appears it will never be, then Black Folks have no choice but to consider other options for our welfare and for the betterment of our progeny. Why should only White Folks talk about establishing a better future for “their children?” Well, it’s time, Blacks Folks, that we start doing the same.
While we revere the efforts of Marcus Garvey and quote his many statements of wisdom, we do not work to fulfill his goals. This man knew all too well that Black Folks would never, ever be classified as first-class citizens and enjoy a true pursuit of happiness. He knew that the White Societies in this world would always see Blacks as Descendants of Slaves and a derogatory rare “animal” with thick lips, wooly hair, and black skin, a people of which they want absolutely nothing to do with other than to keep subservient and the inferior Peoples of this world. I think the saying goes like this, “Silence is Consent.” Well, we have been silent long enough!
A Third World Citation is only able to exist because those who make up this reference have done nothing to make it null and void. Third World existence is due to White World Power and Control. The Native Americans are on Reservations, Descendants of Slaves are without Self Determination, the Aborigines are second-class citizens, and the Palestinians are being wiped out and uprooted all because nothing is done about it. The United States and Great Britain impose sanctions on countries and in the process kill the innocent, and they veto proposals deemed to aid the oppressed and without compassion and certainly without any remorse. If we truly want a change in the lives of Blacks (and other victims of Third World Citation), then it’s up to us to make it happen ‘cause White Folks are determined to assassinate or imprison our leaders and destabilize African countries and keep chains somewhere on those of us who inhabit their lands. This is their best scheme to keep our numbers low and maintain control over our affairs. Admit it! We have been victims of their dictatorship and suppression for long enough
Once the
powers-that-be no longer have control over Black Folks and other people of
color, including so-called Sand Niggers (people of Arabic extraction), the
sooner we can re-establish ourselves.
However, for Blacks there is but one alternative, and that is to
rebuild “Africa.”
There is no
question that this idea will be very much dismissed and denounced by the great
majority of Blacks. Why? Unfortunately for some reason Black
Folks seem to believe that we cannot exist without White Folks. We see what they have done to us,
yet we want to hold fast to their philosophies and systems of exploitation,
manipulation, and control. We
can do better, and we can do so with morality and decency.
There is but ONE WAY OUT of the hell in which we live in the United States and in other White Societies throughout the world. That WAY OUT is to ESTABLISH “AFRICA” as an empire replete with industry, economic power, integrity, true justice for all, peace, and a determination to fulfill this objective. Sounds familiar, right? Yes, of course; these are supposed to be the icons of America. What a joke!
Think about an African
Homeland for Black Peoples; WE CAN DO THIS! But first, we must DEMAND that the
Descendants of the Slavers and Slave Masters pay THE DEBT for the TransAtlantic
Slave Trade and for all the human rights atrocities and injustices committed
against us and up unto this very day.
Now, it is our turn to become the “SQUEAKY WHEEL” in this world!!! And it’s now or
never!
Please see my article entitled, “REALITY AND ACUMEN, IS REPARATIONS, IS EXODUS, IS REPATRIATION, IS FREEDOM, IS SELF DETERMINATION!” found at the very end of this edition of the REPARATIONS NOW IN OUR LIFETIME Newsletter.
Tziona Yisrael, Editor
REPARATIONS NOW IN OUR LIFETIME Newsletter
www.thelawkeepers.org
(Click on
“Repnow”)
*********
PROGRESS IN THE INTERNATIONAL REPARATIONS MOVEMENT
May 6, 2002
PRESS
RELEASE
All For Reparations and Emancipation
In April of 2002 Afro
Descendants gained a significant step forward in The international reparations
effort. The 58th Session of
the UN Commission on Human Rights, meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, passed a
resolution that established a Working Group for African Descendants in the
Americas.
The
resolution, 2002/68 Item 8, on the Working Group for African descendants
in the Diaspora, passed in the final days of the six-week session. It provides for two 5-day long
Working Groups to be held before March of 2003.
These Working Groups will be made up of five independent UN experts from various geographical regions who will meet to study problems faced by Afro Descendants, and gather relevant information from Governments, Nongovernmental Organizations and other relevant sources. The resolution will go into effect after approval by the Economic and Social Council, which meets in June.
This decision is the first official recognition of the collective existence of the descendants of enslaved Africans by the international community. It offers an opportunity for leaders of Afro Descendant peoples to work in unity, under one internationally recognized identity, in order to gain reparations and restoration.
From the beginning of his efforts in 1994, Mr. Silis Muhammad has been urging this type of recognition for Afro Descendants. He has repeatedly asked for a UN forum in which leaders could discuss the means and modalities of reparations in order to be able to move forward in unity. Very recently, in his written and oral statements to the Commission on Human Rights, he reiterated his urgent recommendation for the Working Group for Afro Descendants.
Mr. Muhammad, who has known for some months that this Working Group could be established in 2002, is very pleased that it has now been established. He views it as a response, at least in part, to his many requests for such a mechanism.
All For
Reparations and Emancipation is pleased to announce this progress. We invite
you to visit www.afre-ngo.org or e-mail
Hakimida@aol.com for more information.
Submitted by
TheBlackList@topica.com
*********
REPARATIONS
LAWSUIT FACES CHALLENGES
April 5, 2002
Two weeks ago, attorney Roger Wareham and a
group of plaintiffs filed the first class action lawsuit in a federal court on
behalf of all 35 million African American descendants of slaves. While the
purposes of the lawsuit are clear as they target three major corporations,
including FleetBoston, Aetna and CSX, the coordination of this first shot across
the bow with other attorneys and activists who have been planning similar
tactics is rather vague.
"We have been in contact with Professor
Charles Ogletree who is part of the Reparations Coordinating Committee," said
attorney Jomo Thomas, during an appearance on a Chicago radio station last
Friday. This comment was corroborated by his partner, Mr. Wareham, when asked if
there was consultation with other lawyers.
Consultation, however, doesn't necessarily
mean consensus or agreement, and there was some indication of separate agendas
when attorney Michael Hausfeld remarked to Gil Noble on "Like It Is" last
Sunday that the first lawsuit may have been a bit "precipitous." Noble did not follow up on this
remark. Hausfeld has been successful in representing Jewish Holocaust victims in
their claims for reparations.
Hausfeld said that he is working with the
Reparations Coordinating Committee that includes attorney Johnnie Cochran,
author Randall Robinson, Dr. Manning Marable, Professor Ogletree, and number of
other notables. In a recent
op-ed article to the New York Times, Ogletree broached the separate lawsuit
tactic. "This lawsuit," he said of the one filed in Brooklyn by Wareham and
other plaintiffs, "is limited to FleetBoston, Aetna, CSX and other to-be-named
companies. The broader reparations movement seeks to explore the historical
role that other private institutions and government played during slavery and
the era of legal racial discrimination that followed. The goal of these
historical investigations is to bring American society to a new reckoning with
how our past affects the current conditions of African-Americans and to make
America a better place by helping the truly disadvantaged.
"The Reparations Coordinating Committee, of
which I am a co-chairman," Ogletree continued, "will proceed with its own plans
to file wide-ranging reparations lawsuits late this autumn. The committee is a group of lawyers,
academics, public officials and activists that has conducted extensive research
and begun to identify parties to sue and claims to be raised."
"I think the first lawsuit is doomed to fail
since it is too broad and doesn't have a plaintiff who can be a reliable test
case, showing direct connections to a company that benefited from the
enslavement of a plaintiff relative," said a local attorney who asked that his
name not be used. "This case will be thrown out and it will set a bad
precedent for future cases."
Several responses from the company facing
the initial lawsuit have conjectured similar results, adding that the courtroom
is the wrong venue to seek relief. "If the courtroom is the wrong venue,"
said Wareham, "then we are willing to settle out of court, if they prefer."
But the courtroom seems to be the remaining
option for those who have been exasperated in other arenas, said Ogletree.
"Litigation is required to promote this discussion because political
accountability has not been forthcoming. In each Congressional session since
1989, representative John Conyers has introduced a bill to study slavery
reparations and it has quickly died each time."
Councilman Charles Barron is also preparing
a reparations bill to be introduced in the City Council, which is similar to
ones in motion in New Hampshire and Vermont.
"There are a number of actions in motion on
this issue," said Dr. Conrad Worrill, a veteran activist and currently leading
the campaign for a major reparations march this summer in Washington, D.C., "and
I think it's important that we get on the same page. Nevertheless, I don't think
any of these efforts are in contradiction. We are all moving in a similar way
toward justice and in our demand for reparations for the enslavement of our
ancestors."
By Herb Boyd
TBWT National Editor
editors@tbwt.net
The Black World Today
Submitted by JELPO@AOL.COM
*********
REPARATIONS
UPDATE!
A
Newsletter
April 5, 2002
Get
Your Reparations Update! Newsletter…
The Reparations Mobilization
Coalition (www.murchisoncenter.org/joshua/reparations)
has just printed its first issue of its newsletter: "Reparations Update!" ...and
one can receive it in the mail (either a bulk of copies or just one) by simply
emailing your name and address to: <reparationsnow@tbwt.com>.
Of course, donations to help cover the
mailing costs are gladly accepted.
The intent of this newsletter is to report
on the actions, events, and ideas within the national and international
Reparations Movement. It is also one of the ways we can connect grassroots
Brothas & Sistas to the fundamentals of the Reparations demands. If you have any reparations news or
announcements (two month lead time), feel free to email them to the Reparations
Mobilization Coalition. And if you have friends who don't have access to
emailing, they can send their Reparations news and announcements to:
The Reparations Mobilization
Coalition
122 W. 27th Street 10th
Floor
NY, NY 10001
Reparations Update! is YOUR communications
vehicle. We look forward to your input and assistance in distributing the
newsletter.
In struggle,
Sam Anderson, Muntu Matsimela, Yolanda
McBride, Brotha Chaka for the RMC Newsletter Crew
Submitted by BRC-REP
*********
PAYING
OUT ISN’T THE SAME AS OWNING UP
April 7, 2002
Late last month, lawyers filed suit in U.S. Federal
Court in Brooklyn against three major U.S. corporations -- CSX, FleetBoston
Financial and Aetna -- for profiting from slavery. The class-action suit seeks
damages for centuries of forced labor, which, by one estimate, could amount to a
numbing $1.4 trillion. A thousand more corporations may be named as defendants.
The intended beneficiaries, it is said, will be the 35 million African Americans
who are descended from slaves.
The appeal of such a claim is clear, the virtues of
accountability self-evident. Less obvious but well worth weighing, however, are
the perils. The case promises or threatens (depending on one's point of view)
to open a wide and wrenching debate that may ultimately turn not on evidence but
on the complex relationship between history and justice. It pits the past
against the present, collective responsibility against that of the individual,
national identity against racial identity, and the demand for dollars against
the realization that slavery defies quantification.
At times, it seems America has made a
veritable market of past sins, becoming the First National Bank of Reparations
& Restitution. The slavery issue, 139 years after the Emancipation
Proclamation, is only the most recent in a long line of such appeals. The
United States has paid reparations to Japanese Americans interned during World
War II, to Native Americans whose lands were stolen outright, to Pacific
Islanders whose paradise was nuked, and to those knowingly exposed to dangerous
levels of radiation. New York paid some $8 million to inmates injured or killed
in the 1971 Attica prison uprising. We are hounded by our moral debts. But no
case is more emotionally charged than that of slavery.
Certainly, other nations have faced demands for
reparations: Japan, from South Korea's "comfort women," pressed into
prostitution six decades ago; Germany, from slave laborers under the Third
Reich; South Africa, from those who suffered under apartheid. But Americans live in a world where atrocities are
routinely submitted to lawyers and accountants, where the beads on the abacus
slide back and forth -- one for a nation plundered, one for a race enslaved --
until a balance is struck. It is a fiction that ties the ghost of the
transgressor to the ghost of the victim by divvying up the ill-gotten gains.
Contrition is commoditized. But holding ourselves literally accountable in a
pecuniary sense alone may be to let ourselves off too cheaply. Paying out
does not mean owning up. In fact, by satisfying the claims of the past, we may
inadvertently risk silencing them.
The danger is that over time we may come to see such
payments almost as a form of eminent domain, a legal taking or compensation at
fair market value. The dilemma is how to provide relief to victims of
oppression or atrocities without turning history itself into a kind of moral
toll road, a pay-as-you-go scheme that instead of expiation for the past creates
precedent for the future, anticipating and routinizing the unspeakable. History becomes The Great Indemnifier.
Reparations are not pollution credits to be purchased
in advance. The weight of crimes against humanity ought to create something more
meaningful than a windfall to actuaries, lawyers and distant descendants.
Reparations should be a way of facing up to the past, not of turning our back
on it. Slavery opened with the
buying and selling of human beings. There is something vaguely grotesque about
suggesting that it should end with the drafting of another
check.
It is not the payments that are overdue, but the
debate itself. The current
discourse may force us to confront a past that in our romanticized history is
always eclipsed by an image of America as a freedom-loving land. That
Aetna's predecessors wrote policies for slaveholders but excluded coverage for
slaves' suicides, lynchings and owner abuse speaks not only to the horrors of
slavery but to the knowledge of those horrors beyond the
plantation.
The bottom line to slavery is that there is no bottom
line, no way to calculate such an abomination. Any attempt to do so risks
trivialization. Besides, what is at stake is more than dollars and cents. The
nation is called to bear witness. It is not only the past that demands redress
but the present. The issue is how to remember the past without being sucked
back into it. "It would be a good thing," wrote the noted German dramatist
Christian Friedrich Hebbel, "if man concerned himself more with the history of
his nature than with the history of his deeds."
Some argue that too much time has elapsed, that those
who would pay are innocent and those who would receive were never slaves. The
suit does reach back to 1619, the year the first Dutch ship landed with slaves
at Jamestown, a year before the Pilgrims set sail. But dates are deceptive.
Slavery may be distant, but it is not remote -- not in the consciousness of
many African Americans who see it as the proximate cause of present
inequities.
The relevance of time itself is also at issue.
Slavery is of biblical proportion, creating human dislocations that have the
half-life of plutonium. It cannot be buried out of sight without endangering the
groundwater of future generations. That is the nature of trauma. Today,
racism, the legacy of slavery, weighs upon the offspring of the slave but also
of the master. Even $1.4 trillion would be a bargain if it could rid us of that
curse.
But this lawsuit, if successful, rather than healing
old wounds, may only aggravate them. The financial burden would fall not on
"faceless" U.S. corporations but on individual Americans, black and white.
Millions of African Americans today are employed by Aetna, CSX, Fleet and other
corporations to be added to the list. Minority employees throughout industry
would share the cost of reparations, as would countless black shareholders and
pensioners, as well as universities and the economy at large. Even gross
discrimination does not justify indiscriminate punishment. If history is
replete with crimes against humanity, it also has its share of misguided quests
for justice that promoted nothing but fresh resentment and more suffering.
Today, white America's stereotypes of blacks are
imploding and African Americans have every reason to have hope for the future.
Before them they see black Oscar winners, world-class athletes, a Supreme Court
justice, the secretary of state, the national security adviser, celebrated
musicians and scholars, esteemed poets and authors, top editors, publishers and
entertainment giants, and the swelling ranks of mid- and senior-level black
executives -- including Aetna's executive vice president and chief of health
operations, Ronald A. Williams, and others at the very firms targeted in the
suit.
In focusing on the past, the case also threatens to
divert precious resources -- money, time and emotional reserves -- away from
contemporary affronts to equality. Better such minds and war chests should go
to drawing attention to inner-city schools, disparate prison sentences, racial
profiling and the appointment of public officials insensitive to civil rights.
This may all be the toxic residue of slavery, but reparations will not set it
right.
One is reminded of the ancient Greek, Philoctetes, a
legendary archer who was bitten by a snake and whose wound would not heal. His
fellow warriors, no longer able to stomach the sight of the injury, marooned him
on the isle of Lemnos. Years later, a prophet told the Greeks that without
Philoctetes's bow, they would never take Troy. So Odysseus and his men returned
for him.
The injury done to African Americans also has never
fully healed, and has led to isolation and societal
fragmentation. It has been perhaps
the largest single impediment to realizing our national dreams and ambitions.
Those who champion this suit doubtless see it as a belated reaching out to those
left behind. Reparations are meant to bring some relief to the aggrieved and
some glint of redemption for the oppressor. Justice asserts (no matter how
tardily) that we are answerable to one another. It may well profit us all to
face the evidence to emerge from such a suit, not as an indictment, but as a
tool of reconciliation. "It is the mission of history," wrote Jose Ortega y
Gasset, "to make our fellow beings acceptable to us." Coming to terms with
yesterday's barbarity provides an ongoing test of today's humanity. The case
may be dismissed but not the cause.
"But where does the madness end?" ask those who
oppose reparations for actions committed so long ago. It is more than a
rhetorical question. It raises the legitimate fear that we will slide further
down a slippery slope into an abyss of litigation and liability. How do we
temper right with reason?
For the Australians, the answer was to proclaim an
annual National Sorry Day. Now, each May 26, they reflect on state crimes
committed against the Aborigines. In America we face a Hobson's choice, as if we
must bankrupt ourselves to remain morally solvent.
But at what point can we close the book on past
transgressions? The Holocaust? The Inquisition? The Crusades? Like a giant skein
of yarn, our sins unravel before us, rolling across the floor, yard after yard,
out the door, across the lawn, and all the way back to The Garden itself -- back
to the very first Sorry Day.
By Ted Gup
Ted Gup is the Shirley Wormser Professor of
Journalism at Case Western Reserve University and a writer who holds a law
degree.
The Washington Post Company
Submitted by alarkam@webtv.net
***
If I may interject…
Professor Ted Gup's article on Reparations
is very ambivalent. While claiming
to be concerned about achieving racial justice, the author repeatedly casts
doubts on the viability of Reparations.
He fails to mention even once the international legal battle for
Reparations for all African-Americans which has been unfolding inside the United
Nations for several years. The
goals of that struggle go far beyond monetary restitution. African-Americans throughout this
Hemisphere are still suffering from the lingering effects of plantation slavery,
ethnocide and forced assimilation.
We
must be recognized as a unique people inside the realm of international law and
be restored to our own language and culture. We must also gain the right to build our
own government and economy on some of this Earth that we can call our
own.
As-Salaam-Alaikum,
Minister Malik
Al-Arkam
[How right you are, my Brother! T.Y. Editor]
*********
RANDALL
ROBINSON SAYS THE NATION SHOULD COMPENSATE
THE
DESCENDANTS OF SLAVES
April 5, 2002
Randall Robinson
says.....
TAMPA -- Slavery was carried out with the
complicity of the U.S. government, and that is the strongest argument in support
of reparations for the descendants of slaves, author and activist Randall
Robinson said Thursday. "Think of it as restitution, American compassion," said
Robinson, who spoke at the University of South Florida. "(It will) lift the
floor of the dispossessed, the shutout and the hopeless."
Robinson was the keynote speaker at the
Institute on Black Life's annual symposium on race. He is the author of several
books, including the bestseller The Debt -- What America Owes to Blacks,
and his most recent work, The Reckoning -- What Blacks Owe to Each Other.
Robinson, the past president of the
Washington-based TransAfrica and TransAfrica Forum, is known for his efforts to
help end apartheid in South Africa and to spur the U.S. government to change its
policies toward Haiti.
During his hour long speech Thursday, he
spoke little of current affairs. Instead, he focused on how black Americans
have been deprived of their history.
Black History Month has always troubled him,
he said, because it leads black Americans to believe that their story started
with slavery. "For most
of us, we assume that is all the story we have to tell," he said. "They didn't tell us our story, because
our story is empowering. Instead,
they told a story that didn't fit us."
He used a visit to Washington, D.C., with
his young daughter as an example of how blacks are overlooked in U.S. history.
As they walked along the National Mall, Robinson and his daughter noticed that
there were few blacks strolling near the nation's great monuments.
"We're not at the mall, because there is
nothing there to do with any of us," he said. "Why are we unremarked in this
place . . . that tells American stories?"
In the Capitol, along with the art that
lines the walls, the statues and the marble frieze that documents the history of
America, there is "no Tubman, no Douglas, no Sojourner Truth," he said. "It's as
if slavery never happened."
But the Capitol's sandstone was mined in
Virginia by slaves, Robinson said, and the bronze statue named "Freedom" that
sits atop the building was cast by slaves. "The important buildings and
institutions found their beginnings on the backs of uncompensated blacks," he
said.
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/04/05/TampaBay/Author__America_owes_.shtml
By TAMARA LUSH, Times Staff
Writer
St. Petersburg Times
Submitted by
TheBlackList@topica.com
*********
THE BLACK REPARATIONS FUND
HAS
BEEN GROSSLY EMBEZZLED
April 13, 2002
Reparations is a legal wealth in the holds
of these United States, entitled to U.S. Black slave
descendants. On the part of
Black People, there has been a great deal of passivity, silence and indifference
about this wealth - mostly due to many Blacks being unfamiliar with the legal
terms and practice of Reparations, and some due to the learned Blacks being
frightened that White folks will get mad at them if they ask for their money.
Nevertheless, this silence enables non-Blacks to have a field day spending
this money - this Black folks' money!
Billions of Black People's Reparations
dollars are being donated annually to support a welfare state in the middle
east. Black folks have not
consented to their wealth being spent like this - particularly in lieu of the
fact that this donation does not benefit U.S. Blacks at all (But perhaps the
embezzlers feel that Black folks’ silence gives consent). Billions of Black
People's Reparations dollars are being spent to finance wars that are not Black
folks’ fights. Billions of Black People's Reparations dollars are being spent to
expand companies and corporations that Black folks don't own, and is producing
big-time profits that Black folks aren't receiving or benefiting
from.
It is preposterous for Black folks to remain
in hardship, crisis and SILENCE, while non-Black embezzlers lavish themselves
with Black folks’ money. Poor Black People are SILENCING away the wealth that
would make them not be poor any more. Middle class Black folks are SILENCING away
an income that can get them off America's Black upper echelon welfare programs
(i.e., minority business loans, grants-with strings attached, etc.) and away
from the constant control, will, and manipulation of tricky funding resources.
Rich Black folks are SILENCING away a process that would free them and their
wealth from the jurisdiction, will and command of others.
It is ridiculous in this day and time for
Black People to let their own wealth bypass themselves, and be used as donations
for alien causes. Somebody
has been embezzling the Black Reparations Fund, which is why it has taken Black
People so long to receive their money.
The wealth of America is YOUR legal
property!
By Attorney Dr. Robert L.
Brock
President, The Self-Determination
Committee
Website: http://www.directblackaction.com
[AND unfortunately, the wealth of America
maintains the IMPOVERISHMENT and REPRESSION of Descendants of
Slaves.]
"I
freed thousands of slaves. I could have freed thousands more
if
they
had known they were slaves."
Mama Harriett
Tubman
"The
only protection against injustice in man is
power....physical,
financial,
and scientific."
Marcus "Mosiah"
Garvey
http://www.menofrespect.org
Submitted by TheBlackList
*********
BERRY
URGES BLACKS TO CONTINUE
REPARATIONS
MOVEMENT
Reparations are part of the unfinished business of
the civil rights movement, said Mary Frances Berry, guest lecturer in the first
installment of Beach Institute's 2002
series on reparations.
"In
fact, no matter how we look at it, at this hour the civil rights movement was
very successful," she said. "I know that in a place that Clarence Thomas came
from it's kind of hard to say that. But, the civil rights movement was
successful."
After the laughter subsided, Berry spoke to the packed
sanctuary Thursday night on how the nation has backslided in civil rights, the
historical beginnings of the reparations movement, and where the movement is
headed today.
Listening to the distinguished academician, lawyer,
and chairperson of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is, in many ways, like
chatting with an old friend. In her brief lecture at Second African Baptist
Church, Berry skillfully wove together history, humor and hard-hitting
facts.
"New attention in this kind of climate has been turned to the
demand for reparations. The title of this (series) you have is 'Forty Acres
and a Mule.' Well, I have to tell you I'd like 40 acres, but I'd like it to be
oceanfront property. And you can forget the mule," she said to much laughter and
applause.
The unfinished business Berry spoke of has two elements, she
said. One is making sure the law really stands for equality and justice. The
other part is the economic agenda.
The nation -- when headed by
President Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush -- tried to create what it assumed
were solutions to economic inequality between blacks and whites. Those
strategies -- more education and targeted programs -- have failed, Berry
said.
"The effort is under way all across this country to work on
(reparations). There are scholars and activists trying to make a case," she
said.
Lawyers have argued the theory of unjust
enrichment.
"Whites and their descendants were unjustly enriched and
blacks and their descendants were unjustly impoverished by the exploitation of
black labor," she said.
Some also argue there should be housing and
health care, but not cash given, as a form of reparations.
Berry
highlighted the work of Robert Brock of the Self Determination Committee in
Washington, D.C., in the 1960s. He filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles
asking for reparations and damages. The government did not answer his petition
and it was ultimately lost in court.
Berry cited a New York woman who
went to law school to figure out a way to make a case for reparations. She
uncovered records showing insurance giant Aetna had written life insurance
policies on slaves where the beneficiaries were the slave masters.
"So,
anywhere you sort of lift up the cover, you will find these connections, because
they are there," Berry said.
But many white Americans, she said, reject the notion
of reparations for blacks on several fronts. They will say they personally
didn't own slaves and neither did their parents, Berry said. Other common
arguments are, "How can you establish who gets paid?" and "What about the Union
soldiers who fought in the war, after all they freed these African
Americans?"
"Well, the answer to that is most of us can figure out our
ancestry if we want to. We can trace people. In my family we can do it. We
know who the slaves were and we can go all the way back to the plantation,"
Berry said. Union soldiers all got
pensions, bounties, old-age benefits, and jobs, she said.
"Then they say,
'What about the immigrants who came after slavery was over?' Well they benefited
from the infrastructure that was there before, because America benefited from
slave labor," she said.
Some opponents, Berry added, say reparations have
already been paid -- pointing to the welfare system.
"Well, welfare benefits go to everyone. And there are
more whites on welfare, or were before Bill Clinton ended welfare, than blacks,"
she said. "Then they say, 'Well you all have racial preferences, and affirmative
action has given you all of the best jobs in America.'
"Well we know what
the answer to that is, don't you?"
In fact, Berry says evidence
opponents have themselves produced says racial preferences may not have reached
the vast majority of African Americans.
"This may mean that those who
seek reparations have more work to do to prove the case, but that's all right, I
don't really think that's the problem," she said.
In fact, Berry is
currently working on a book that offers the federal government's own records as
proof that the reparations movement began in earnest in 1897.
To
answer opponent's assertions that, "We would be for (reparations) if these
people were alive," Berry says, "Well they were alive then. And the people then
weren't for it."
But, said Berry, the movement didn't
die.
"The movement that you see today for
reparations is merely an outgrowth of all that work," she said. "When we talk
about reparations today -- however the issue is decided -- all we are really
doing in a sense is being true to the memory of those who struggled, and who
went to jail and worked hard for this cause, and the old ex-slaves who died in
poverty and got nothing."
By Hermione Malone
Savannah Morning
News
The Beach
Institute's 2002 lecture series on reparations and the economics of
race continues at 3 p.m. Sunday at the Beach
Institute.
All remaining lectures will be held there as well,
each beginning at 3 p.m.
David Blight, professor of history and black
studies at Amherst College
Lee Baker, director of undergraduate studies
and associate professor of cultural anthropology and African and
African-American studies at Duke University
William "Sandy" Darity,
professor of economics at the University of North Carolina and research
professor of public policy studies at Duke University
Robert Westley,
associate professor of law at Tulane University
For more information, contact the Beach Institute at
234-8000 or visit http://www.kingtisdell.org.
Submitted by JELPO@AOL.COM
*********
UNITED
STATES TO RECEIVE FIRST ON-LAND
MIDDLE
PASSAGE MONUMENT
August 2, 1999
On Friday, July 16, 1999, Homeward Bound
Foundation president Wayne James announced that the United States
will receive the first of the six on-land Middle passage Monuments scheduled to
be erected between the years 2000 and 2005 in the six regions of the world where
the transatlantic slave trade occurred, namely Africa, the Caribbean, Central
America, Europe, North America and South America. Plans are to unveil the
U.S. monument on July 3, 2000, exactly one year after the original Middle
Passage Monument was lowered onto the door of the Atlantic Ocean, 427 kilometers
off New York's harbor, facing Africa.
"The purpose of the ocean monument is to serve as a
gravestone on the world's largest graveyard, the Atlantic Ocean's infamous
Middle Passage, where estimated millions of African people died en route to the
transatlantic slave trade between the 15th and 19th centuries, their bones
forming a trail from Africa to the Americas. The purpose of the on-land monuments is to encourage
the global, collective healing from the slave trade and its aftermath of
racism," said Wayne James.
Five other on-land monuments will be placed annually
following the North American Middle Passage Monument: South America in 2001, the
Caribbean in 2002, Europe in 2003, Central America in 2004, and Africa in 2005.
The following 10 criteria were considered in choosing
the United States over Canada and Mexico for the North America monument:
1) The historic significance of the proposed
site-country in the slave trade between the 15th and 19th centuries.
2) The presence of African- and/or African
Diaspora-related activities and facilities in the proposed site-country (ex.
museums, university degree programs, libraries, festivals).
3) The African and/or African Diaspora
population in the proposed site-country.
4) The political stability of the proposed
site-country.
5) The governmental interest in the Middle
Passage Monument.
6) The proposed site-community’s interest in
the Middle Passage Monument (ex. signed petitions, letters of support from
community organizations and individuals, academic papers).
7) The presence of civil rights laws and/or
policies protecting the interests of all minority groups, regardless of race,
nationality, color, gender, sexual orientation, and religion).
8) The tourism-related infrastructure of the
proposed site-country.
9) The overall appropriateness of the proposed
site-country.
10) The overall appropriateness of the specific
site.
"There were significant arguments in favor of
each country," said Wayne James. " The 12 –member panel, after much
consideration, concluded that the United States was in the best position to
embrace the Monument Project, setting the standard for the other recipient
regions to follow. The order in which the various regions were designated to
receive their respective monuments was determined by drawing lots, the first
region drawn receiving the first monument and the last receiving the last,"
James said.
At the suggestion of the HBF, the Congressional Black
Caucus, led by Congresswomen Donna Christian-Christiansen and Cynthia McKinney,
is in the process of securing federal land in the following cities as potential
sites for the Middle Passage Monument: Washington, DC; Savannah, GA; New York, NY;
Charleston, SC; and Alexandria, VA. The HBF is also considering state/municipal
sites in Newport, RI; Boston, MA; New York; NY; Newark, NJ; Philadelphia, PA;
Baltimore, MD; Washington, DC; Alexandria, VA; Charleston, SC; Savannah, GA; and
New Orleans, LA.
Designed by a multi-racial team of seven metal
artists on St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands, the on-land monuments will
feature a cubism-inspired, 50-foot arch made of brushed aluminum. The three-part
arch symbolizes the need for the past, present, and future to converge in order
for cultural identity and pride to be realized. A 100-foot, granite walkway,
each foot representing an estimated million African people who perished during
the transatlantic slave trade, will be inscribed with the history of Africa and
the Diaspora, ancient and modern, hieroglyphics, symbols, significant dates,
events, names, and places. "Our goal is to create a monument which all serve as
a symbolic pilgrimage, physically, culturally, and spiritually, back to Africa,"
James said. "The on-land monument will encourage discourse, education,
understanding, and healing from the atrocities of the slave trade," James
concluded.
Submitted by
JELPO@AOL.COM
[I would prefer to see these monuments AFTER
Reparations has been paid.
I’d hate for folks to think that these images and the cost for their
formations would in any way compensate for the barbaric and cruel crime against
Black Humanity during the TransAtlantic Slave Trade when Blacks were forcibly
migrated to lands of captivity and now when our descendants still endure pain
and suffering generated from this heinous past. T.Y., Editor]
*********
APOLOGIZING
FOR SLAVERY IS SMALL PRICE
FOR
PEACE
April 3, 2002