THE LAWKEEPERS

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the arguments by christians to force themselves or "Rape" non-christians into submission of christianity.

First of all, christians are always trying to use "guilt" to brainwash non-believers into a polytheistic religion.  What I mean by polytheistic, the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost in what people call the Trinity.  Some people refer to The Most High as Jesus, some say that j.c. is the son of G-d, some people refer to j.c. as G-d.  All of these beliefs are very far from the truth.  In dealing with the christian, NEVER be on the defensive.  Be aware that you are dealing with a brain-washed person and not a rational theologian.  Of course I have only come across one intelligent and rational theologian.

One of the "weapons" of submission by a christian is Isaiah 53.  Does the scripture actually point to j.c.?  NO!  In the  second verse of Isaiah it says "For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, but in the third verse, He is despised and rejected of men, and in the fourth verse it says, "Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows.  Look at the change of tenses in these three verses, four, if you count verse five.  Verse two responds to the future (shall grow), the next verse refers to the present and the final verse refers to the past.  But he was wounded for our transgressions, again the past tense.  If this passage refers to j.c., there is something very wrong with the christian translation of this very chapter.  Here is another problem with this translation of Isaiah 53:7.  The scripture says he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter, and as a sheep before her shearers is dumb, so he openeth not his mouth.  If you look in Matthew 27:46, not only was j.c. not silent, but he cried out to G-d and asked G-d why did he forsake him.  This is not a silent sheep.  Here's another mistranslation by christians in their "proof" of the prophecy of j.c.  In Isaiah 53:10, it says that "he shall see his seed, he shall prolong his days.  This means that the subject of Isaiah 53 will have children.  J.c. did not have children.  So this cannot refer to j.c.

The christians have come to the conclusion that the Messiah or jc was to be born in Bethlehem.  Here is the reality check, hundreds if not thousands of babies were born in Bethlehem and at the same time as j.c.

If you read Isaiah 9, the birth of the Prince of Peace.  This does not apply to j.c.  Remember j.c. did not bring peace which is evidenced by world wars and nuclear weapons that have become part of  every day life.  Another favorite piece of scripture from the Old Testament is Isaiah 7:14, the virgin birth.  This is the prophecy of the birth of Ahaz's son and this chapter discusses the two invading armies.  Remember that j.c. was born during the reign of Herod the Great?  Another "weapon" of christianity - the genealogy of j.c.  If you read Matthew chapter 1, it shows the genealogy of Joseph, not j.c.  If j.c. is considered by the NT to be a child of G-d, who is not from the tribe of Judah, nor from any tribe, this proves that j.c. is not from the line of David.  If you show this to a christian, they will tell you that Mary is from the line of David.  This is totally absurd, because only male names were listed in the 15 verses of Matthew 1 and in Luke  3, it constantly states, "the son of", etc.